![[Pasted image 20260110200904.png]] "High bone mass" and "Low bone mass" “IGF-1” Lol. I am crying here. When will men stop falling for this utter ridiculous garbage? ![[Pasted image 20260110201455.png]] I want every degenerate popularizing this stupid "looksmaxxing" rubbish to understand the concept of predisposition, evolutionary and archetypal physiognomy and physiology. You want these two archetypes to have the same frontal facial features? You absolute idiots. There is such a thing as a "useful idiot" and then there are idiots who are damaging to whatever they touch. They'd like to generalize and simplify complex ideas to things as basic as taking a supplement to “signal a hormone” or rubbing royal jelly all over their bodies for benefits. Clown show. There are males who are predisposed to hard chewing, flatter teeth and wider jaws - these are your "fighters". There are males who are predisposed to have better balance, smell, vision, hearing - these are your "hunters". There are also "survivalists". What most of these utterly uneducated degenerates in the manosphere are doing is comparing one archetype to the other - thinking they've somehow unlocked the secret of attraction. Yes, you can manipulate facial bones to slightly protrude more - going against your disposition. This is the equivalent of a horse trying to grow a tiny horn just so it can be considered a unicorn. It is pathetically infantile and wholly redundant - instead of embracing your gifts and working to discover them - you are trying to be 10% of something else. Ugliness isn't just about looks, and neither is [[Truth And Attraction]]. Parts of them believe they are ugly. True for all looksmaxxers - these are young men who deep down believe that they're inherently unwanted and unlovable. That's why they have excess energy fueled by desperation when it comes to appearance, constantly seeking validation from the external about how desirable they are. Even the whole insecurity movement about height is misunderstood. Men today think height is some sort of objective metric for attraction or "alpha"-ness. Generally, women don't really prefer taller men *just* because they're tall - they prefer taller men because their fathers, overwhelmingly, are taller than they are - or were taller as they were growing up, so their first imprint of a father figure is someone who towers over them as a protective and authoritative presence, especially if they're young and still developing their own individuality. The female is first and foremostly attracted to the male that, in her mind, simulates the mannerisms and behaviors of her father figure the most authentically and completely, or embodies the opposite (if the parent is overbearing or overprotective). Men struggle with women today because they fail to become the moral and spiritual authority in their eyes, but the recipe is very simple. The [[Male Hierarchy]] is not based on looks whatsoever. Rule #1 is this: If you don't know how to treat a girl (most men don't) - treat her like a father figure would. That means operating with a tinge of condescension and a sense of superiority, but not excessively - and with her genuine best interests at heart. That means a nurturing but strict, mentorship type of tone and a communication style built around playful humor, hinting at unspoken boundaries and high standards of behavior for both parties. Master that and, for the first few years, you'll be able to get most of the women you drool over. Over time, you will build a genuine desire to keep a woman's best interest at heart - for all women, regardless of attraction. When you reach this part - you won't even have to do or say anything to command a woman's respect. "[[Priming Your Aura]]" or whatever they call it.