Every human has an intended societal and spiritual role in this world, assigned to them through divinely intellectual design. Physiognomy proves this on its utmost basic level. What other formulaic arts try to reverse-engineer - physiognomy tells directly and with immediate accuracy. This is why there are no resources on physiognomy online except for a few questionable books and tattered manuscripts from the 1900s, and even those are full of inconsistencies and dramatization. And also why movements are formed that aim to have others believe in some sort of "objective metrics for beauty". You cannot standardize human design. Sometimes you can improve your existing imprint - especially if there is some sort of mechanical issue or injury. Other than that - your imprint exists to be respected and admired and, most of all - ACCEPTED. God's intention is different with every person - and believe me when I tell you that he is very, very precise. Your physiognomy shows us what you're naturally good at. How you think, where you excel, where you don't. Your imprint is the perfect map to answer the question: "What the fuck should I be doing with my life?" Most people live and die without ever knowing their intended role. Your physiognomy shows your sins and your deeds - and whatever came before you and will come after you. The greatest secret of facereading is that a person's physiognomy shows EVERYTHING about them. Intuitively, we all know this, that's why some characters turn you off by default. This isn't just accidental, it's a deep, innate click going off somewhere in your mind - a warning sign. Everything is already written on everyone's face - who they are, how honest they are, whether they lie or not, how compassionate they have the capacity of being, their impulsiveness, toxic habits and tendencies, their relationship with their past, present and future, etc. No one can hide anything from a person who has mastered this skill, but _actually_ mastered it - without creating silly biases that uplift their own and degrade the other. I've wrestled with the idea recently of -> why would I even teach this skill that can be exploited and misused by those without dignity and honor? Now I know that I must only teach and share portions of my research and expertise that help specifically in identifying thieves, liars, deceivers and people with unhealthy, violent behaviours and manipulative tendencies. My purpose has never been clearer. Physiognomy expertise is life on easy mode. People take years to know who's trustworthy or not. 5 seconds and a look in the eyes is all it really takes. Also, the more you know on a formulaic level - the more your intuition is allowed to activate about people too. Easy. That being said, what most people think is physiognomy is actually not. It is fake garbage. People have written whole books on physiognomy and about 90% of their info is wrong and cannot be recreated in real life scenarios. That's why it never popped off in popularity. Physiognomy is the art of reading involuntary SURFACE SYMPTOMS as PROOF of HIDDEN meanings on a multi-layered spectrum. Each face and every glance is a crossword puzzle. And every puzzle is designed in a way where it innately desires and wishes to be solved. Reading faces is the art of knowing very much from very little, deciphering what is most likely from that which is given and already present without question. The practitioner must adopt this mindset if they wish to find success in this art. If the face is a curtain, then the forms hiding behind that curtain must also be present as silhouettes upon its surface. There is no such thing as a perfect curtain. If there is, then the lack of symptoms serves as proof of depth itself. The absence of something that is likely to be there sometimes speaks more than its presence. Even in its utmost basic form, the face reveals the essence or integral characteristics of how a person most likely thinks and views the world. What level of detail they usually see things with, how much they tend to "zoom" in or out, whether they map their thought process chronologically or holistically, how they react to emotional stimulus, how they receive said stimulus and what the base default emotional and temperamental state it is they carry. And more. You know the lens through which they interface with the external, and the attitudes through which they filter incoming information. When a person suppresses their imprinted nature, they also oppress it, and this oppression does not go unnoticed, especially for the trained eye. What I am trying to say is that, in this art, the lack of evidence, more often than not - is the evidence. There is no need for direct evidence for assumptions to be made and truths to be deciphered. We do not look for science and measurement, nor are we looking for the means through which certain effects are achieved through a single channel. What we are looking for are the symptomatic end-results that can only possibly be derived from certain inner states, thoughts, and mindsets. We are not looking for 100% proof. We are looking for a multitude of proofs on a spectrum and within the range of 60-70% efficacy. When several traits featured on the face all direct towards a simple conclusion, in large-enough quantity, the likelihood of our assumption being 100% correct is largely guaranteed. When you have proof of someone's sociopathic tendencies, as one example, let's say about 65% positive from a single facial trait - it is not enough for a strong assumption. But if you have 4, 5, 6 other 65% proofs as sources that lean in that same direction - they compound to such a number that it adds up to a number that is only a small percentage shy of a hundred. So, how can we be sure? What if I told you that we don't need to be sure. At all. We don't need direct evidence. We don't need unquestionable proof. We just need the symptoms of what's already glaringly obvious, or lack thereof. Most of "physiognomy" knowledge (and I've said this before) is not real knowledge. It's just bullshit. 99% of physiognomy out there and face reading manuals are garbage. I won't ever shy away from saying this. They are almost all false. The problem with mainstream physiognomy is that it's, for the lack of a better word - subversive bullshit. If we followed the lessons of physiognomy, impulsive, explosive characters like Tyler Durden from Fight Club wouldn't have been played by Brad Pitt - as one example. He would've had to swap that role out with Ed Norton (the "Narrator"). Brad Pitt, according to his physiognomy, would never have had the raw energy to pull any of that crap off that he's poised to pull off in the film. And that is best represented by his real life persona as well. Brad Pitt is a journalist-educated, baby-faced favorite that prioritises safety, consistency and puts a lot of time (secretly) into looking young and presentable. He's no underground badass. And then you take a look at photos of Stalin from when he was young. Now that's a cold-hearted, blood-feuding killer with the capacity to pillage and loot - but you won't see a scrawny-ass man playing him in the movies, I promise you that. Ask yourself that - why is entertainment and Hollywood in particular working so hard to subvert our understanding of natural archetypes? Physiognomy is a "grey-zone" discipline. It can be hurtful at times. But its function is not to judge others. Its function is to interpret that which is freely given by the bearer of each face. If I see someone is dishonest and a thief, I will tell my friends so. Wouldn't you? This is my craft and this is my art. This is my domain and this system I built - I am the absolute best in face-reading. Knowing yourself is knowing what you're best in the world at. No need to be fake humble. And I am rarely ever wrong, unfortunately - give it a little taste yourself. Faces are portals. And portals are after-images of where they lead. Yes, a world behind each painting. One cannot travel there with the body. But one may enter with the mind. All humans are wombs. Birthing the world within. Into matter. Twelve-and-one destinies. Merging into One. Physiognomy isn't looksmaxxing, And looksmaxxing isn't physiognomy. Physiognomy isn't facereading, And facereading isn't physiognomy. Physiognomy is strict, formulaic - it is, more or less, a flawed science that should still be respected. Facereading, on the other hand, is an intuitive practice and, for the most part - the superior of the two. Looksmaxxing is mechanical. Physiognomy is imprinted. Facereading is intuitive and mystical. ![[0f18e34af60dc641ea0ab8dbd110febd.jpg]]