Women sniffing out if a guy watches porn vs women sniffing out if a guy is going to beat and abuse them ![[IMG_20260108_194416_390.jpg]] A plot twist you perhaps might not be ready for is that they know very well who's going to beat and abuse them, but choose to pursue anyway. Women with low self-esteem need dramatized external validation for their biases, they make their choices according to this external confirmation. Because she doesn't see herself as a good judge of character, temperament and strength, she requires absolute surety in the man's capacity for aggression and his disagreeable nature. She feels that she'll be able to turn this rage outwards and use it as a shield against the world that she's so afraid of. Obviously, this is a deadly assumption to make and, most of the times (if not always), ends up in reverse. She will never admit to this, of course, but nature is the greatest teacher. Most women succumb to their fears, of which most are heavily materialist fears - they feel increasingly under threat in a society that is becoming less and less dangerous by the year. In general, women are naturally vulnerable to delusions about objective truth and tend to dramatize both negative and positive emotional inputs to radical degrees. For example, a guy who watches lewd content, in her mind, is on the radical end of being a loser because that's what her external stimuli (society, other men) is telling her, and the man who is imprisoned because he's dangerous to society is elevated to status of high competence. When the criminal receives attention from other males, she sees this as special treatment. She automatically assumes this is because he, the criminal, is special. All these eyes, all these guards, handcuffs, formalities, etc - all just for one man. She gains a retarded, twisted sense of empathy for the man she deems highly competent, especially if other men (the external stimuli) regard him as dangerous as well. The logic is lost, of course, because this is an emotional breakdown of the topic and not a logic-based conversation with the self. She can't understand the simple fact that most men are holding back their most dangerous sides due to, well, mutual understanding of the importance of peacekeeping and reducing general violence. Why can't she see this? Because there is not an overwhelming amount of external noise that is feeding her this confirmation. She is infinitely attracted to the most dangerous specimen in the room, but not because he actually is the most dangerous, but because he is the loudest and most performative regarding the matter, and most of her initial experiences with men are negative due to this. If ten of us conspire to sit at the table and everyone goes "wow, you're so funny!" every time I say something objectively distasteful, by the end of the evening she will have convinced herself that I am, in fact, very funny. Are women stupid? yes and no, they're just programmed to think in different ways. When it comes to men though - they definitely make some incredibly stupid choices. But this is by design, you can't antagonise the nature of a thing. This is caused by societal and spiritual regression. When a woman is afraid of life, she resorts to these kinds of gambles. First thing a good man teaches his daughters is confidence, self-defence, mental clarity and strength. Women are absolutely wonderful when they can pass this hurdle and step into an existence devoid of material lack and fear of survival, but they are degenerate and untrustworthy when in their "survival mode". The best ones, and the most high-quality ones, are taught these things early-on in childhood. I hardly judge women for trying to survive and manoeuvre an increasingly confusing world, but that doesn't mean we should overlook their ignorance and naivety. Most women today are not worth courting as they offend the man on the virtuous path by disregarding his physical needs when they matter the most, and they hate it when I say this, and most men avoid saying this too, because they believe it will reduce their chances of getting on with the women they know. But we all know I don’t care about those things, he's already found his fulfilment. So there you go, most women make a key portion of their life decisions and fashion their worldviews according to external stimulus and "environmental storytelling". The alternative is that women cannot be allowed to make such decisions, and that these decisions must be delegated to their authority. Feminine intuition, by design, is both the strongest and the least dependable. FEMALE [[Intuition And Instict|INTUITION]] GLIMPSES INTO ONE'S MOST POSITIVE POTENTIAL. MALE [[intuition and instinct|INTUITION]] GLIMPSES AT WHAT CURRENTLY IS. Why even the smartest ladies will often mate with the wrong men. Damaged women often mistake [[fear]] for excitement. This simple mistake usually shapes their regressive lifestyles and horrible choice in partners. Just recently gave a young woman reading to not interfere with his abusive partner's life lesson. She then used her ex-partner's connections to both get him out of a short stay in prison and married him regardless. You can only lead a horse to water... I already saw she'd made her mind up, of course. She removed me from social media after - thinking I'd be somehow disappointed by her decision because she, too, knew it was the wrong choice - yet she did it anyway. This is the human experience, you cannot explain it. "He is a psycho, mentally unstable," she said. Even his car plates had the word "psyc" on them. He revelled in it. I told her: "So you are attracted to fear, to the excitement of it. You want to marry Death but Death takes no wives, only trophies." And she nodded in agreement. Understand that, energetically, the abuser and the abused are on the same wavelength - and the court and justice system also need to understand this - but it will be centuries before this phenomena is understood by the mainstream. The woman invites the abuse, 99% of the times.